George Floyd. Bronna Taylor. Arberie Amo. David Harris gave these names in a presentation Wednesday to other Americans killed by police violence, noting that the list is so long that he will not be able to reach the end in the allotted time.
The list is too long to finish, and too awful to think about, said Harris, a law professor at Pitts University.
The Center for Race and Social Issues of the University held a presentation on race, police and the death of unarmed civilians: What can I do? On Wednesday afternoon as part of the CRSPCast series, Harris, who is also moderator of the Criminal Justice Podcast, gave a presentation on the system of aggression created by the police in wartime, followed by questions moderated by James Hugley, acting director of the CRSP, and John Wallace, Senior Fellow of the CRSP.
According to Harris, the military police is a training system that encourages the use of physical violence by local agents. Police officers learn that the use of violence is a just form of violence, he said, which is always considered justified because it fights crime.
Being brave and brave isn’t without fear, Harris said. Fear is now a very important part of police training and culture. The police train themselves in a certain way to try and overcome this, but in reality they do the opposite.
There is a whole industry dedicated to training private police officers and already working in this field, said Harris, who structures his education around this warrior ideology.
The idea of being a warrior is simple — there’s a war going on, and the police are on the front lines, Harris said. What our society finds so disturbing in these interactions – lack of respect, anger, violence – is not the result of false learning. This is the result of the war preparations.
Harris cited recent New York Times data that Minneapolis police are seven times more likely to apply violence – including chemical irritants, neckbands, canines – to black citizens than to white citizens. Usually, says Harris, more than one type of violence is used in these incidents.
There is no reason to believe that Minneapolis is much better or worse than most other cities, Harris said.
When police officers are trained to treat their neighborhood like a battlefield, Harris says, fear penetrates both sides of the interaction between the police and society in general.
This leads to incidents that shouldn’t become violent, and they’re violent and deadly, Harris said.
According to Harris, one of the ways to reduce the violence associated with police work by soldiers is to change the style of police work and instead follow a police model based on guardianship. In this training, police officers are seen as defenders of public peace and quiet.
The police at the base of the Guardian has a vision that the police will look out for their neighbors, protect them and serve as neighbors, Harris said. That’s what our police have to do, except respond to real emergencies. We don’t want them to fight.
Such changes, Harris said, are much closer to reality in the United States than many citizens believe. California has limited its minimum legal justification for the use of force by a police officer to 2019 and has allowed the use of force only when it was necessary, not when it was reasonable. A representative of Summer Lee, D-34, submitted a similar bill to the committee last June, but no further action has been taken.
While this is only a small change, Harris said the bill has the power to improve the responsibility of employees in the field. He said he urged Pennsylvania lawmakers to consider whether their experience with the police was different and how the bill would affect the relationship between the police and citizens.
If you’ve already called the police and they show up, they point guns at you, you might feel differently, Harris said. Put yourself in someone else’s shoes. Think about how people who are different from you will be confronted with police intervention.
Once the community can show empathy, Harris said, things can change.
There are reasons why people are angry, there are reasons to protest, and there are reasons to change things. We can’t go on like this, Harris said. We have the power to be different.importance of police accountability,police brutality accountability,police accountability statistics,police accountability activist,police brutality research paper,scholarly articles on police brutality,police brutality,police brutality cases